Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 11 JANUARY 2008

Construction Law Update: Programming And Critical Path Analysis

Mirant v Ove Arup concerned claims by Mirant Asia-Pacific Construction (Hong Kong) Limited against various Ove Arup companies for breach of contract and negligence in relation to the construction of a power station in the Philippines.

AustraliaReal Estate and Construction
David Goldstein
David Goldstein
Bree Miechel
Bree Miechel

Mirant Asia-Pacific Construction (Hong Kong) Limited v Ove Arup and Partners International Limited v Ove Arup International Limited and Ove Arup Partners Hong Kong Limited [2007] EWHC 918

Mirant v Ove Arup

concerned claims by Mirant Asia-Pacific Construction (Hong Kong) Limited against various Ove Arup companies for breach of contract and negligence in relation to the construction of a power station in the Philippines.

The case illustrates the difficulties that are often encountered when it becomes necessary for parties to complex building or engineering projects to establish the real cause of delay to the project.

Mirant's claims arose out of the failure of two of the main foundation's of boiler unit 1 of the power station.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from