Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 11 FEBRUARY 2019

Non-existent goods not covered by marine cargo insurance

In this decision, the cargo claimant was unsuccessful in its claim against its insurers under an open cover cargo policy.

AustraliaInsurance

In brief - Engelhart shows that to cover financial losses that do not result from physical loss or damage, the open cover cargo policy must contain clear words to that effect

The facts in the English High Court decision in Engelhart v Lloyds Syndicate 1221 (2018)2 Lloyds Rep. 24 should cause concern to anyone involved in the international carriage of goods by sea, whether as traders or insurers. In this case, the cargo claimant was unsuccessful in its claim against its insurers under its open cover cargo policy.

Physical loss claims do not include circumstances where insured is defrauded into taking out documents of title for non-existent goods, Court finds

The claimant had purchased copper ingots from a supplier which it had then on sold to a consignee in China. There were two shipments involved. The first arrived at the ultimate destination but the second had never been shipped, and there was no cargo to be physically lost or damaged. The losses were therefore

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from