Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 12 JUNE 2018

Key considerations for insurers when considering renewal proposals and asserting non-disclosure

This article focuses on the Court's reasoning in relation to non-disclosure, and lessons to be drawn from the decision.

AustraliaInsurance
Bronwen Peberdy
Bronwen Peberdy

In brief - Court of Appeal upholds finding that QBE 386 not entitled to deny indemnity for alleged non-disclosure

In the recent decision of QBE Underwriting Ltd as managing agent for Lloyds Syndicate 386 v Southern Colliery Maintenance Pty Ltd [2018] NSWCA 55, the Court of Appeal has given insurers a timely reminder of matters they must take into account when considering a renewal proposal, and when contemplating an assertion of non-disclosure by the insured.

Southern Colliery Maintenance cross-claims against QBE 386 after insurer denies indemnity

  • Southern Colliery Maintenance Pty Ltd (SCM) entered into a special services agreement in January 2005 to provide supplementary labour for five mines owned by subsidiaries of BHP Billiton, including Endeavour.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from