Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 02 NOVEMBER 2011

Insured entitled to indemnity for defence costs

The insured was entitled to recover defence costs pursuant to a costs extension clause in the insurance policy.

AustraliaInsurance
Major Engineering Pty Limited v CGU Insurance Limited [2011] VSCA 226

Introduction

In this case the Court of Appeal of Victoria found that an insured was entitled to recover defence costs pursuant to a costs extension clause in a policy in circumstances where the insured had successfully defended the claim made against it.

Background

Major Engineering Pty Limited ('Major') held a broadform liability policy with CGU which provided public and product liability cover and an additional benefits extension providing cover for certain legal costs. Major sought indemnity under the policy for a claim brought against it by Timelink Pacific Pty Ltd.

Timelink's claim was for damages arising out of the failure of two hydraulic cylinders that were supplied by Major for the racing yacht 'Skandia' owned by Timelink. The hydraulic cylinders were fitted to the specially designed 'canting' keel of the yacht. During the 2004 Sydney to Hobart yacht race, the hydraulic

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from