Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 25 OCTOBER 2011

Defence costs of insurers under threat

NZ interpretation may threaten the ability of insurers in NZ and Australia to advance defence costs.

AustraliaInsurance

The recent New Zealand High Court decision ofSteigrad & Ors v BFSL 2007 Limited & Ors, High Court of New Zealand CIV-2011-404-611 ("Steigrad Decision") is causing headaches for Australian and New Zealand directors, their insurers and brokers. The decision may have far-reaching implications on the ability of insurers to advance defence costs in certain circumstances.

The Steigrad Decision involves the New Zealand equivalent of section 6 of the Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1946 (NSW) ("Section 6"). The Australian Capital Territory and Northern Territory have similar sections - section 206 Civil Wrongs Act 2002 (ACT) and section 26 Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act (NT).

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from