Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 03 AUGUST 2021

Context must be considered where there is ambiguity in an insurance policy

Full Court ultimately prefers Policy Interpretation which refers to extrinsic contextual material where Policy terms are not clear.

AustraliaInsurance

In the Full Federal Court decision of Liberty Mutual Insurance Company Australia Branch trading as Liberty Specialty Markets v Icon Co (NSW) Pty Ltd [2021] FCAFC 126 given on 20 July 2021, the Full Court addressed the construction and scope of thirdparty liability policies in the context of claims made by a building and construction company for losses occurring as a result of the manifestation of serious defects within a building, during the defects liability period.

Factual Background

Building and construction company Icon Co (NSW) Pty Ltd ('Icon') entered into a design and construct contract ('the Contract') in October 2015 to build the now infamous Opal Tower, a 37-storey mixed residential/commercial development property at Sydney Olympic Park. The contract provided for a 12 month defects liability period following Practical Completion, which occurred in August 2018.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from