Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 17 DECEMBER 2008

Beaconsfield – A Gold Mine For Insurers?

The case was recently heard on appeal (Allstate Exploration NL v QBE Insurance (Australia) Ltd [2008] VSCA 148) where the insurer's denial of indemnity was upheld.

AustraliaInsurance
Marcus Saw
Marcus Saw

In the December 2007 edition of Insurance Focus, we looked at the case of Allstate Exploration NL v QBE Insurance (Australia) Ltd [2008] VSC 380 which considered the interpretation of an industrial special risks policy arising from the collapse at the Beaconsfield Gold Mine in Tasmania. The case was recently heard on appeal (Allstate Exploration NL v QBE Insurance (Australia) Ltd [2008] VSCA 148) where the insurer's denial of indemnity was upheld.

Background

Following the much publicised collapse at the Beaconsfield Gold Mine in Tasmania on 25 April 2006, Allstate Exploration NL (Allstate) (joint venturers of the mining operations) sought indemnity under an industrial special risks (ISR) policy issued by QBE Insurance (Australia) Ltd (QBE) for business interruption losses resulting from the mine closure after the collapse. The mine closure was the result of miners being trapped and the ensuing rescue operation, as opposed to any physical damage to the mine. QBE

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from