Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 29 FEBRUARY 2012

A Turbulent Year for Australian Insurers

In two recent cases, subject exclusion clauses have been read down to retain the commercial purpose of the policies.

AustraliaInsurance

EXCLUSION CLAUSES

In two cases this year, subject exclusion clauses have been read down so as to retain the commercial purpose of the policies.

In Mainstream Aquaculture Pty Ltd v Calliden Insurance Ltd [2011] VSC 286 (Mainstream decision), Mainstream Aquaculture Pty Ltd (Mainstream) conducted a commercial fish breeding business involving the growing and sale of fish and had a business interruption policy with Calliden Insurance Ltd (Calliden). On 26 October 2008, the property experienced a loss of electrical power supply due to the failure of a fuse, which resulted in the death of a large portion of Mainstream's fish stock. Mainstream claimed under clause three of its policy with Calliden, which provided cover for losses arising from the failure of supply from public utilities.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from