Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 04 JANUARY 2016

Remuneration, expenses and proportionality - an update for insolvency practitioners

Insolvency practitioners need to prove that their claims for remuneration are proportionate and reasonable.

AustraliaInsolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring

In brief - Insolvency practitioners need to prove that claims for remuneration are proportionate and reasonable

The Courts are increasingly focusing on considerations of proportionality when reviewing claims for remuneration and expenses.

In this article I will discuss how the concept of proportionality has been applied by Courts across Australia, including the recent appeal decision of the Federal Court of Australia which extensively considered and explained the correct application of the concept.

Stockford case highlights problems with time-based administrator's fees

Finkelstein J highlighted issues surrounding remuneration in his 2004 Judgment Korda, In the Matter of Stockford Limited (Subject to Deed of Company Arrangement) [2004] FCA 1682. He discussed "some of the vexed issues that concern the fees of insolvency practitioners, particularly registered liquidators, receivers and administrators. There is wide-spread belief, not confined to Australia,

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from