Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 10 APRIL 2017

Not so perfect solution - Court relief sought to avoid automatic vesting of security interest

Corrs Chambers Westgarth
Corrs Chambers Westgarth
Contributor
Corrs Chambers Westgarth

Corrs Chambers Westgarth

Corrs Chambers Westgarth is Australia’s leading independent law firm. We provide exceptional legal...

View firm profile
Explore more from Corrs Chambers Westgarth

Administrators should be mindful of making an application for an order to avoid automatic vesting of a security interest.

AustraliaInsolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring

This week's TGIF considers a recent Federal Court decision in which relief was sought under section 588FM of the Corporations Act to ensure a security interest perfected after the 'critical time' did not automatically vest.

WHAT HAPPENED?

On 7 April 2016, administrators were appointed to OneSteel. OneSteel, a member of the Arrium Group of Companies, subsequently entered into a deed of company arrangement.

Prior to entering administration, OneSteel used plant and equipment hired from K.J Renfrey Nominees Pty Ltd atf The Renfrey Family Trust (hereinafter referred to as 'Renfrey'). After OneSteel was placed into administration, Renfrey discovered that it had incorrectly registered its security interest under a hire services agreement against OneSteel's parent company, Arrium Limited.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from