Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 09 AUGUST 2010

Committees of Inspection – Caution!

In Jindal Transworld PVT Ltd v Scottsdale Homes No. 10 Pty Ltd (No 2) [2010] SASC 210 (13 July 2010), a liquidator sought an order that his remuneration be fixed under s473(3) of the Corporations Act 2001

AustraliaInsolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring
Peggy Wong
Peggy Wong

In Jindal Transworld PVT Ltd v Scottsdale Homes No. 10 Pty Ltd (No 2) [2010] SASC 210 (13 July 2010), a liquidator sought an order that his remuneration be fixed under s473(3) of the Corporations Act 2001. It was opposed by the company's only creditor on the basis of entitlement and quantum, and that the application was not competent because s473(3)(a) was not satisfied. That section prescribes that a liquidator's remuneration can be determined, if there is a committee of inspection ("COI"), by agreement between the liquidator and the COI. The creditor argued s473(3)(a) was a condition precedent to any court application.

Formation of a Committee of Inspection

The COI was formed by a resolution of creditors. The issue was whether a resolution of creditors was sufficient to validly form a COI. Section 548 states that a liquidator must, if requested, "convene separate meetings of the creditors and contributories" to determine whether a COI should be formed. No

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from