Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 03 DECEMBER 2014

The case for local government amalgamation in NSW

Corrs Chambers Westgarth
Corrs Chambers Westgarth
Contributor
Corrs Chambers Westgarth

Corrs Chambers Westgarth

Corrs Chambers Westgarth is Australia’s leading independent law firm. We provide exceptional legal...

View firm profile
Explore more from Corrs Chambers Westgarth

The NSW state government will not force amalgamations, but it provides financial incentives to encourage local councils.

AustraliaGovernment, Public Sector

In its Fit for Future package, the NSW State Government has published its position on local council mergers. It makes no pretence at forcing amalgamations, instead providing financial incentives to encourage local councils to make their own moves.

While this answers in part the "what's in it for us?" question for local councils and their communities, it highlights the apparent absence of other compelling motivators for amalgamation.

IS "BIGGER BETTER"?

Conventional wisdom cites economies of scale and efficiencies for merged councils as the justification for amalgamation.

For example, Randwick City Council estimated in April 2013 that a hypothetical Eastern Suburbs Subregional Council comprising Woollahra, Waverley, Randwick and part of Botany, would achieve a surplus of $518 million with no debt, service levels maintained and no infrastructure backlog over a 10 year period.1

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from