Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 25 MAY 2014

The pros and cons of enforceable undertakings (EUs)

EUs are a flexible, timely and relatively cost effective regulatory tool compared to civil or administrative proceedings.

AustraliaFinance and Banking

By: Lucinda McCann and Amanda Velonis

A Senate Inquiry into the performance of the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has been prompted by concerns about ASIC's handling of certain potential risk and compliance management issues arising in relation to Commonwealth Financial Planning Limited (CFP).

Whilst the terms of reference of the Inquiry were wide, the two main issues that arose in relation to CFP were:

  • the lengthy delay between ASIC becoming aware of the potential issues and taking enforcement action
  • the appropriateness of enforceable undertakings (EUs) as a regulatory tool in all circumstances: that is, whether EUs allow a regulated party to negotiate an outcome with ASIC that may have few specific or general deterrent effects, when contrasted with alternative courses of regulatory action such as court, civil, administrative or infringement action.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from