Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 21 MARCH 2024

State Of Play: Taking 'Reasonable Steps' Under Financial Services Law

On 29 February, Jackson J handed down the decision in Australian Securities and Investments Commission v R M Capital Pty Ltd [2024] FCA 151 (ASIC v RM Capital).

AustraliaFinance and Banking

On 29 February, Jackson J handed down the decision in Australian Securities and Investments Commission v R M Capital Pty Ltd [2024] FCA 151 (ASIC v RM Capital).

The case concerned whether RM Capital Pty Ltd (RM Capital), a financial services licensee, took reasonable steps to ensure its authorised representative, The SMSF Club Pty Ltd (SMSF Club), did not receive conflicted remuneration, as required under section 963F of the Corporations Act.

This is the first time a court has considered the construction of section 963F.

The decision is also relevant to other Chapter 7 obligations, such as the obligation that requires licensees to "take reasonable steps to ensure" their representatives comply with financial services laws under section 912A(1)(ca) and section 961L, which requires licensees to take reasonable steps to ensure that representatives comply with the best interests duty and other personal advice obligations.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from