Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 30 JANUARY 2017

Penalty provisions – when are liquidated damages unenforceable?

The High Court considered whether credit card late payment fees charged by a bank were considered to be penalties.

AustraliaFinance and Banking

In the recent case of Paciocco & Anor v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited ("Paciocco") [2016] HCA 28, the High Court considered whether credit card late payment fees charged by a bank were considered to be penalties.

Where a contract specifies an amount payable to one party for breach of a contract term, often referred to as a liquidated sum, and that sum is not based on a genuine pre-estimate of the damage suffered by the breach, the clause can be deemed a penalty, and unenforceable. The clause must reflect a negotiated level of risk that the parties agree to bear on breach of contract. Differentiating between a liquidated sum and a penalty, will be a matter of construction, judged at the time of contract formation.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from