Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 16 FEBRUARY 2013

Deferred purchase price/loan note arrangements - Do you have enforceable security?

There could be lenders whose current security arrangements are unenforceable because stamp duty has not been paid,.

AustraliaFinance and Banking

In the recent case of Bondi Beachside Pty Ltd v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2013] NSWSC 21, Justice Gzell of the NSW Supreme Court held that an agreement (whether or not in writing) to extend the payment date for the purchase of a loan note under a deferred purchase price/loan note financing arrangement amounted to a forbearance to pay (and therefore was an "advance" for the purposes of section 206 of the Duties Act 1997 (NSW)).

We are aware that there have been differing views on this issue and consequently there could be lenders in the market whose current security arrangements are unenforceable because stamp duty has not been paid in respect of their securities (under section 11 of the Act, "A mortgage on which duty is required by this Chapter to be paid is unenforceable to the extent of any amount secured by the mortgage on which duty has not been paid.").

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from