Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 25 MAY 2024

Market Intelligence Thought Leadership Award Winner

ASIC v BPS: time to book your CAR agreement in for a service?

Piper Alderman
Piper Alderman
Contributor
Piper Alderman

Piper Alderman

Helping shape the future of business in Australia with practical, commercial and cutting-edge legal...

View firm profile
Explore more from Piper Alderman

Licence holders and their authorised representatives should review the scope of their CAR agreements.

AustraliaFinance and Banking

Michael Bacina, Steven Pettigrove & Luke Higgins of the Piper Alderman Blockchain Group bring you the latest legal, regulatory and project updates in Blockchain and Digital Law.

It has been just a few weeks since the Federal Court decision in ASIC v BPS Financial Pty Ltd (Qoin) was handed down, and industry professionals are continuing to weigh in on the consequences of the decision. The case is ASIC's first court win relating to a crypto-asset wallet, but also provides court guidance on what is a "facility" in the context of a non-cash payment facility (NCPF) and the scope of the exemptions from holding an AFSL in the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth).

The "authorised representative" exemption allows a person or entity to provide a financial service under the Corporations Act on behalf of the holder of an Australian Financial Services Licence (AFSL) as the authorised representative of the license holder under a written agreement, without having to hold an AFSL itself.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from