Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 21 MARCH 2016

Amendment and restatement of a guarantee – new, replacement or change?

In the case, the legal nature and effect of an amendment and restatement of a guarantee document was the central issue.

AustraliaFinance and Banking

Overview

There can be numerous modifications made to the terms of a commercial finance facility over its life.  Sometimes these are contained in a short amendment document, where only the particular changes are recorded.  There may be a number of these over time and, in more complex and long-running transactions, it is common at some point for the original facility agreement with its changes to be "amended and restated" – in other words, consolidated and contained in a single document.  That is as much for ease of reading as anything.

In the decision of the Court of Appeal of Western Australia in Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited v. Manasseh (delivered on 10 March 2016), the legal nature and effect of an amendment and restatement was the central issue.  The case involved a claim by the Bank under a guarantee which had been granted when the facility was first provided. The result was a victory for the guarantor who successfully argued that

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from