Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 10 OCTOBER 2011

Reasonable apprehension of bias by prejudgment

The Court found there were no grounds to support a finding of apprehended bias by prejudgment on the part of Council.

AustraliaEnvironment

On 20 May 2011, the Land and Environment Court gave its decisionin Capital Airport Group Pty Ltd v Director-General of the NSW Department of Planning (No 2) [2011] NSWLEC 83.

The Court examined whether Council's decision to submit a draft Local Environment Plan to the Director- General of the Department of Planning and Infrastructure was infected with apprehended bias. This required the Court to consider whether apprehended bias in the nature of prejudgment (as opposed to bias based on interest) had tainted the Council's decision.

Facts

Capital Airport Group Pty Ltd (Applicant) challenged the validity of two decisions made at intermediate stages of the process for making the draft Local Environment Plan (LEP) for South Tralee, NSW. The draft LEP provides for the rezoning of South Tralee for residential and other purposes. The Applicant is associated with the nearby Canberra Airport and has for many years opposed the rezoning of South Tralee.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from