Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 07 SEPTEMBER 2022

R v Rumble – implications for executive officer liability for environmental harm offences

Cooper Grace Ward
Cooper Grace Ward
Contributor
Cooper Grace Ward

Cooper Grace Ward

Cooper Grace Ward was established in 1980 and has quickly become one of the largest independent...

View firm profile
Explore more from Cooper Grace Ward

Recent decision has implications for executive officer liability in environmental harm offences.

AustraliaEnvironment

In this case, former Linc Energy executives were charged with offences against Queensland's Environmental Protection Act 1994 after a Linc Energy underground coal gasification project near Chinchilla caused serious environmental harm. The Court of Appeal decision in R v Rumble has implications for executive officer liability in environmental harm offences under Australian environmental legislation.

Brief overview of the Environmental Protection Act 1994 (Qld)

Under section 493 of the Act, if a corporation commits an offence, each of the executive officers of the corporation also commits an offence of failing to ensure the corporation's compliance with the Act.

'Executive officer' is defined in Schedule 4 of the Act to mean a person who is either:

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

© Cooper Grace Ward Lawyers

Cooper Grace Ward is a leading Australian law firm based in Brisbane.

This publication is for information only and is not legal advice. You should obtain advice that is specific to your circumstances and not rely on this publication as legal advice. If there are any issues you would like us to advise you on arising from this publication, please contact Cooper Grace Ward Lawyers.

See more popular content from