Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 10 OCTOBER 2011

Penalties for potential harm to threatened species

When the Commission carried out bush fire hazard reduction, it burnt a critically endangered environmental habitat.

AustraliaEnvironment

On 8 June 2011, the Land and Environment Court gave its decision in Director-General, Department of Environment, Climate Change and Water v Forestry Commission of New South Wales [2011] NSWLEC 102.

In this case, the Court considered whether the Forestry Commission of New South Wales was in breach of the National Parks and Wildlife Act 1974 (NSW) (NPW Act) when it carried out bush fire hazard reduction resulting in the burning of a critically endangered habitat in a national park.

Background

The Forestry Commission of NSW (Commission) pleaded guilty to the offence against s175(1)(a) of the NPW Act of contravening a condition attached to its threatened species licence (Licence), contrary to s133(4) of the NPW Act. The bush fire hazard reduction took place between 29 April 2009 and 21 May 2009 and resulted in the burning of over 90 per cent of the Smoky Mouse habitat in the Nullica State Forest.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from