Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 24 JUNE 2021

Market Intelligence Thought Leadership Award Winner

Government decision-making – climate change and Australian children

The Federal Minister owed Australian children a duty of care when considering approval of the coal mine extension project.

AustraliaEnvironment

Federal Court finds Australian children are owed a duty of care in relation to climate change

In the recent decision of Sharma v Minister for the Environment [2021] FCA 560, the Federal Court held that Minister Ley, the Federal Minister for the Environment, owes Australian children a duty of care when considering whether to approve the Vickery Coal mine extension project (Extension Project) under Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Cth) (EPBC Act).

This decision is likely to have widespread implications not only for the future of resource project approvals, but also for various decision makers when exercising statutory powers in the context proposed developments with potential climate change impacts.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from