Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 17 MARCH 2022

Federal Minister For The Environment Does Not Owe Duty Of Care

The Full Federal Court handed down its much-anticipated judgment in Sharma today. A summary of the judgment of the Full Federal Court allowing the appeal is set out below, with the full judgment available here.

AustraliaEnvironment

The Full Federal Court handed down its much-anticipated judgment in Sharma  today. A summary of the judgment of the Full Federal Court allowing the appeal is set out below, with the full judgment available here. The Minister for the environment does not owe a novel duty of care at common law when exercising her power under ss 130 and 133 of the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999  (Cth) (EPBC Act) to consider and approve an extension of a coal mine in New South Wales.

Snapshot

  • Each judge handed down a separate judgment, finding that the duty was not owed on different legal bases (see further detail below). The EPBC act formed a central part of each judge's reasoning.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from