Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 25 MAY 2010

ESD and the Sustainable Planning Act 2009: Where is the Balance? (Part 1)

The subject for this conference session "ESD and the Sustainable Planning Act 2009 - Balance or Precaution?" implies that there may be a question as to whether the principle of "ecological sustainability", which is embedded in the statutory purpose of the Sustainable Planning Act 2009 (SPA)1, has altered in some way. This paper examines that question.

AustraliaEnvironment

(Part 1) (see Part 2)

David Nicholls, Partner at HopgoodGanim Lawyers

Introduction

The subject for this conference session "ESD and the Sustainable Planning Act 2009 - Balance or Precaution?" implies that there may be a question as to whether the principle of "ecological sustainability", which is embedded in the statutory purpose of the Sustainable Planning Act 2009 (SPA)1, has altered in some way. This paper examines that question.

In an early judgment2 which considered the statutory purpose of the Integrated Planning Act 1997 (IPA)3, a submitter appellant asked the Planning and Environment Court to apply the "precautionary principle" which was one of the ways of advancing the IPA's statutory purpose4. The precautionary principle remains in the objects of the SPA in exactly the same form. In that case, His Honour Judge Robin QC examined a number of judgments of the New South Wales Land and Environment Court5, and an article written by His Honour Justice

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from