Log in or register
Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 05 NOVEMBER 2014

Draft amendments to the Queensland Assessment Bilateral to accredit the IAR process have been released

Clayton Utz
Explore more from Clayton Utz

The amendments aim to change the impact assessment report (IAR) process for a project undergoing a bilateral assessment.

AustraliaEnvironment
Karen Trainor
Karen Trainor
Kathryn Pacey
Kathryn Pacey
Author LinkedIn connections

Key Points:

The proposed amendments to the Assessment Bilateral will change the way an IAR assessment is carried out under the SDPWO Act for a project undergoing a bilateral assessment.

Draft amendments to the Bilateral Agreement between the Commonwealth and the State of Queensland (Assessment Bilateral) have been released for public consultation. Written comments on the draft amendments can be made until 5pm on 21 November 2014.

The primary purpose of the draft amendments is to accredit the new "impact assessment report" (IAR) process under the State Development and Public Works Organisation Act 1971 (SDPWO Act).

Accrediting the new impact assessment report process

In accrediting the IAR process, the proposed amendments require three things.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Register for freeORLog in

View source

Related Articles

Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics

Read more about

Related Comparative Guides

See more popular content from

Article

EPBC Act Reforms: Consultation On Proposed Regulations To Support Final Tranche Of Reforms

Australia's Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water has released consultation papers outlining the regulatory framework for the final phase of environmental protection reforms under the EPBC Act. With submissions closing on 13 October 2026 and implementation scheduled for 1 December 2026, these reforms will fundamentally reshape how projects are assessed and approved, introducing streamlined pathways...
AustraliaEnvironment
Corrs Chambers Westgarth
Corrs Chambers Westgarth
Podcast

Corrs High Vis: Episode 62 - Power, Planning & Data Centres - Inside NSW’s New Guidelines (Podcast)

The NSW Government has released a comprehensive data centre policy framework establishing new guidelines for electricity network connections, planning approvals, and environmental standards. These reforms require data centres to contribute to network infrastructure costs, procure renewable energy, and demonstrate demand flexibility while offering streamlined approval pathways for compliant projects.
AustraliaEnvironment
Corrs Chambers Westgarth
Corrs Chambers Westgarth
Article

New South Wales–No Shortcuts On Scope 3: High Court Puts Scope 3 Emissions Back On The Table For Resource Projects

The High Court of Australia has ruled that NSW planning authorities must consider Scope 3 greenhouse gas emissions when assessing resource and energy development applications. In a landmark 3:2 decision, the Court invalidated approval for the Mount Pleasant coal mine extension, establishing that consent authorities cannot fulfill their climate change obligations by examining only Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions.
AustraliaEnvironment
K&L Gates
K&L Gates
Article

UN Special Rapporteur On The Human Right To A Clean, Healthy, And Sustainable Environment Intervenes In Proceedings In An Australian First

The UN Special Rapporteur on the Human Right to a Clean, Healthy, and Sustainable Environment has made history by intervening in Australian Federal Court proceedings challenging the extension of Woodside's North West Shelf gas project until 2070. The intervention raises critical questions about how international environmental law obligations should inform the interpretation of Australia's Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act, particularly regarding climate change impacts and heritage
AustraliaEnvironment
Jones Day
Jones Day
Article

The High Court, Scope 3 GHG Emissions And What It Means For Development Applications

The High Court of Australia has delivered a landmark judgment on greenhouse gas emissions in mining development applications, examining whether consent authorities must consider conditions to minimize Scope 3 emissions. The case centers on a judicial review of the Mount Pleasant coal mine expansion approval, where the Independent Planning Commission imposed conditions on Scope 1 and 2 emissions but not on Scope 3 emissions that represented 98% of the project's total emissions.
AustraliaEnvironment
Holding Redlich
Holding Redlich