Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 18 MARCH 2022

Does Australia need stronger environmental protection laws?

A recent decision determined that the government has no duty of care to protect us, or our children, from climate harm.

AustraliaEnvironment

A legal decision by the full bench of the Federal Court has determined that the Australian Government has no duty of care to protect us, or our children, from climate harm.

Three Federal Court judges have unanimously reversed a previous court finding, after an appeal by the Environment Minister Sussan Ley.

Long-running legal battle

The original decision in a case taken to court by eight children in the year 2020, who were seeking to block the expansion of Whitehaven Coal's Vickery Coal mine in Northern New South Wales. The mine is expected to produce an additional 100 million tonnes of carbon emissions, equating to as much as 20% of Australia's carbon footprint.

The Federal Court decision denied the children's bid to stop the expansion, but it did rule that as Environment Minister, Ms Ley has a duty of reasonable care to not cause the children personal injury when exercising her legislative decision-making powers regarding the mine.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from