Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 05 DECEMBER 2018

CK Alert Update: serving notices under s 408 of the Environmental Protection Act (Qld)

Case clarifies the requirements for vendors serving a Notice & highlights the broad discretion that Courts are willing to give.

AustraliaEnvironment

In late September, the Queensland Court of Appeal handed down its judgement in Albion Mill FCP Pty Ltd v FKP Commercial Developments Pty Ltd [2018] QCA 229. This came in response to an appeal by Albion Mill FCP Pty Ltd ("FCP") against the Supreme Court's findings in FKP Commercial Developments Pty Ltd v Albion Mill FCP Pty Ltd [2017] QSC 322.

The appeal clarifies the requirements for vendors serving a notice under s 408 of the Environmental Protection Act 1994 (Qld) ("EPA") and highlights the broad discretion that Courts are willing to give.

On both matters, the Court of Appeal affirmed the findings of Justice Jackson at first instance and dismissed the appeal.

Facts

For a more detailed outline of the facts and our assessment of implications of the Supreme Court's judgement at first instance, please seeour earlier alert Serving Notices under s 408 of the Environmental Protection Act (QLD).

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from