Log in or register
Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 12 MARCH 2009

Changes To Practice And Procedure In The Planning & Environment Court

HopgoodGanim
Explore more from HopgoodGanim

There have been a number of recent changes to the rules and procedures relating to the Planning & Environment Court. A new set of rules, the Planning and Environment Court Rules 2008 along with Planning and Environment Court Practice Direction No. 2 of 2008, commenced in December 2008.

AustraliaEnvironment
David Nicholls
David Nicholls
Author LinkedIn connections

There have been a number of recent changes to the rules and procedures relating to the Planning & Environment Court.

A new set of rules, the Planning and Environment Court Rules 2008 along with Planning and Environment Court Practice Direction No. 2 of 2008, commenced in December 2008. The new rules replace the old Planning and Environment Court Rules 1999, and the new Practice Direction replaces the Practice No.1 of 2006. The new P&E Court Practice Direction No. 2 of 2008 also commenced in December 2008. It replaces the P&E Court Practice Direction No. 1 of 2006.

As a general comment, many of the requirements formerly found in the old practice direction have been transported into the new rules.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Register for freeORLog in

Related Articles

Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics

Read more about

Related Comparative Guides

See more popular content from

Article

EPBC Act Reforms: Consultation On Proposed Regulations To Support Final Tranche Of Reforms

Australia's Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water has released consultation papers outlining the regulatory framework for the final phase of environmental protection reforms under the EPBC Act. With submissions closing on 13 October 2026 and implementation scheduled for 1 December 2026, these reforms will fundamentally reshape how projects are assessed and approved, introducing streamlined pathways...
AustraliaEnvironment
Corrs Chambers Westgarth
Corrs Chambers Westgarth
Podcast

Corrs High Vis: Episode 62 - Power, Planning & Data Centres - Inside NSW’s New Guidelines (Podcast)

The NSW Government has released a comprehensive data centre policy framework establishing new guidelines for electricity network connections, planning approvals, and environmental standards. These reforms require data centres to contribute to network infrastructure costs, procure renewable energy, and demonstrate demand flexibility while offering streamlined approval pathways for compliant projects.
AustraliaEnvironment
Corrs Chambers Westgarth
Corrs Chambers Westgarth
Article

New South Wales–No Shortcuts On Scope 3: High Court Puts Scope 3 Emissions Back On The Table For Resource Projects

The High Court of Australia has ruled that NSW planning authorities must consider Scope 3 greenhouse gas emissions when assessing resource and energy development applications. In a landmark 3:2 decision, the Court invalidated approval for the Mount Pleasant coal mine extension, establishing that consent authorities cannot fulfill their climate change obligations by examining only Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions.
AustraliaEnvironment
K&L Gates
K&L Gates
Article

UN Special Rapporteur On The Human Right To A Clean, Healthy, And Sustainable Environment Intervenes In Proceedings In An Australian First

The UN Special Rapporteur on the Human Right to a Clean, Healthy, and Sustainable Environment has made history by intervening in Australian Federal Court proceedings challenging the extension of Woodside's North West Shelf gas project until 2070. The intervention raises critical questions about how international environmental law obligations should inform the interpretation of Australia's Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act, particularly regarding climate change impacts and heritage
AustraliaEnvironment
Jones Day
Jones Day
Article

The High Court, Scope 3 GHG Emissions And What It Means For Development Applications

The High Court of Australia has delivered a landmark judgment on greenhouse gas emissions in mining development applications, examining whether consent authorities must consider conditions to minimize Scope 3 emissions. The case centers on a judicial review of the Mount Pleasant coal mine expansion approval, where the Independent Planning Commission imposed conditions on Scope 1 and 2 emissions but not on Scope 3 emissions that represented 98% of the project's total emissions.
AustraliaEnvironment
Holding Redlich
Holding Redlich