Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 12 SEPTEMBER 2011

Case of disaster resistance v disaster resilience

Looks at increase in disaster events, and whether property and infrastructure can be made more resistant.

AustraliaEnvironment
Peter Williams
Peter Williams

As Australians become increasingly anxious about the threat of natural disaster, building infrastructure that is better able to cope with these traumatic events must be a priority as we repair the damage caused over this last year and move on to deliver in excess of $700 billion of infrastructure across Australia. 

Floods in Queensland and Victoria, fires in Western Australia, and earthquakes in New Zealand and Japan have raised the consciousness and sensitivity of Australians to these extraordinary events. 

The MWH Critical infrastructure Report 2011, release in April, found that 85 per cent of Australians believe we are experiencing changes to our climate (whether human-induced or otherwise remains part of community debate) and the majority link these changes to the frequency and severity of disaster events.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from