Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 07 NOVEMBER 2016

Yes, it's unlawful to require a union EBA for a construction project!

Cooper Grace Ward
Cooper Grace Ward
Contributor
Cooper Grace Ward

Cooper Grace Ward

Cooper Grace Ward was established in 1980 and has quickly become one of the largest independent...

View firm profile
Explore more from Cooper Grace Ward

The case is a warning for construction companies of potential risks when subcontracting on unionised construction sites.

AustraliaEmployment and HR

A recent decision in a penalty hearing before the Federal Circuit Court serves as a warning for construction companies of the potential risks when subcontracting on unionised construction sites.

The first respondent, J Hutchinson Pty Ltd (Hutchinson) was a construction company responsible for the construction of a high-rise residential project on the north side of Brisbane. Hutchinson employed the second respondent, Mr Hawley, as a contracts administrator. Hutchinson also employed the third respondent, Mr Berlese, as a team leader. Mr Hawley reported to Mr Berlese.

Before tendering for tiling works, Hutchinson received an unsolicited phone call from C & K Tiling Pty Ltd (C & K). C & K provided Hutchinson with a quote to complete the tiling works and the parties entered into negotiations. During the course of these negotiations, Hutchinson, via Mr Hawley, queried whether C & K had an EBA. C & K responded that they did have an EBA in place and no further discussion

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from