Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 08 DECEMBER 2011

When terminating an injured worked is not unfair

Injured worker's employment was terminated because of his inability to perform the inherent requirements of his job.

AustraliaEmployment and HR

Michael Harte v Forbes Australia Pty Limited t/as Hunt Boilers [2011] FWA 6948

Mr Harte's employment was terminated by Forbes Australia Pty Limited (Forbes) on the basis he was unable to perform the inherent requirements of his job. Mr Harte sought relief under s394 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) on the basis of unfair dismissal.

Mr Harte seriously injured his foot at work in December 2004. Upon returning to work in August 2006, Mr Harte performed office based duties before resuming his technical role. In November 2007 Mr Harte was promoted to a service technician, level 2, and by December he was promoted to the role of Service Supervisor – Mechanical (SSM).

In mid 2010 Mr Harte had surgery to remove a plate from his foot. After surgery Mr Harte settled a permanent disability claim as he believed he would never return to his pre- injury status.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from