Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 24 JULY 2017

One-sided flexibility in the workplace: Australian and UK responses

Corrs Chambers Westgarth
Corrs Chambers Westgarth
Contributor
Corrs Chambers Westgarth

Corrs Chambers Westgarth

Corrs Chambers Westgarth is Australia’s leading independent law firm. We provide exceptional legal...

View firm profile
Explore more from Corrs Chambers Westgarth

The article compares recent trends and legislative developments between Australia and the UK over workplace flexibility.

AustraliaEmployment and HR

The recent Fair Work Commission (FWC) Full Bench decision to insert casual conversion clauses in modern awards,1 and the Report of the Taylor Review of Modern Working Practices in the UK,2 are responses to the same world-wide phenomena.

Increasingly, businesses are wanting to engage workers flexibly: over the last 20 years, this has led to the growth of casual, part-time and fixed-term employment – and independent contractor arrangements – in Australia.

The most recent manifestation of this flexibility has been the rapid rise across the globe of the 'gig economy': technology-based platforms which match consumers to workers who provide services.

However, the Theresa May Government-initiated Taylor Review has noted concerns that some employers use flexibility to transfer risk to – and exert control over – workers: what the Report describes as 'one-sided flexibility'.3

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from