Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 29 APRIL 2012

Key lessons from the Amcor employment case

Holding Redlich
Holding Redlich
Contributor
Holding Redlich

Holding Redlich

Holding Redlich is a large national commercial firm with offices in Melbourne, Canberra, Sydney,...

View firm profile
Explore more from Holding Redlich

Under an employment contract, an employee owes the implied duties of loyalty, honesty, confidentiality and mutual trust.

AustraliaEmployment and HR

On 20 March 2012 Justice Vickery of the Supreme Court of Victoria handed down a decision in Hodgson v Amcor Ltd; Amcor Ltd & Ors v Barnes & Ors [2012] VSC 94. The judgment followed 35 days of hearing, during which a number of separate issues were heard.

The focus of this article is the claims made in that proceeding by the previous Group General Manager (GGM) of Amcor's Fibre Packaging business, Mr James Hodgson (Hodgson). Hodgson claimed that he was owed various amounts under his contract of employment as a result of the termination of his employment by Amcor on 1 October 2004. Amcor defended Hodgson's claims on the primary basis that Hodgson was disentitled to the amounts claimed by reason of serious misconduct.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from