Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 31 MAY 2013

Federal Court rules on the interaction between the Victorian Construction Code and Implementation Guidelines and the adverse action provisions

Corrs Chambers Westgarth
Corrs Chambers Westgarth
Contributor
Corrs Chambers Westgarth

Corrs Chambers Westgarth

Corrs Chambers Westgarth is Australia’s leading independent law firm. We provide exceptional legal...

View firm profile
Explore more from Corrs Chambers Westgarth

The CFMEU has successfully challenged a key aspect of the Victorian State Government regulation of industrial relations.

AustraliaEmployment and HR

The CFMEU has successfully challenged a key aspect of State Government regulation of industrial relations in the building and construction industry, with the Federal Court finding in two separate decisions that implementation of the Victorian Government's Construction Code and Implementation Guidelines involved unlawful adverse action and coercion against the employees of two bidders for government-funded work.

The decisions have been keenly anticipated, both as a measure of the extent to which State Governments can pursue industrial relations objectives through procurement policy, and also as an indicator of the extent to which industrial laws need to factored into commercial contract negotiations involving labour supply. These decisions illustrate the increasing significance of the general protections provisions in Part 3-1 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (FW Act) in everyday commercial contexts such as large-scale tender and contractor selection processes. The

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from