Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 11 MAY 2015

Chain of responsibility compliance must come before breach

Holding Redlich
Holding Redlich
Contributor
Holding Redlich

Holding Redlich

Holding Redlich is a large national commercial firm with offices in Melbourne, Canberra, Sydney,...

View firm profile
Explore more from Holding Redlich

A liable party in a chain of responsibility cannot escape liability by implementing compliance procedures after the fact.

AustraliaEmployment and HR

A recent case (Kemp v Air Liquide Australia Ltd[2014] NSWSC 1200), involving a fatality resulting from a poorly secured load, hits home that a liable party in a chain of responsibility cannot escape liability by implementing compliance procedures after the fact.

After the fatal accident, but not before proceedings were commenced, Air Liquide (the Company) established a 'national working group' to address the chain of responsibility (CoR). That group met monthly and circulated items to action.

The Company also engaged in a structured safety and risk management process used to measure, on a monthly basis, the Company's performance and its management in three basic areas dealing with its CoR obligations.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from