Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 12 NOVEMBER 2018

Bug bites at a Queensland call centre - claim for compensation

The ailment was not considered an injury for the purposes of the SRC Act, so Ms Carlson was not entitled to compensation.

AustraliaEmployment and HR

Carlson and Telstra Corporation Limited [2018] AATA 3359.

Key Points:

  • The Tribunal was required to consider whether a Telstra employee suffered an allergic condition as a result of insect bites sustained while working at a call centre in Queensland.
  • The Tribunal found in favour of the employer.

Background:

On 15 December 2016, Ms Carlson submitted a claim in respect of "allergic vasculitis", affecting her arms and legs. Ms Carlson claimed that the vasculitis was caused by insect bites sustained while working at the Call Centre.

The Law:

For liability to exist for the vasculitis, the Tribunal must be satisfied that the condition was contributed to, to a significant degree, by Ms Carlson's employment with Telstra.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from