Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 17 NOVEMBER 2008

A Tale Of Two Injuries

In two recent cases, the Administrative Appeals Tribunal was called upon to determine whether or not two conditions in respect of the same physical organ or structure arising from a single work-related incident constituted separate injuries within the meaning of the Safety, Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 1988.

AustraliaEmployment and HR
Julian Pinder
Julian Pinder

In two recent cases, the Administrative Appeals Tribunal was called upon to determine whether or not two conditions in respect of the same physical organ or structure arising from a single work-related incident constituted separate injuries within the meaning of the Safety, Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 1988 (SRC Act).

This distinction is significant because following the High Court's decision in Canute v Comcare (2006) 226 CLR 535, impairments flowing from separate injuries cannot be combined for the purposes of meeting the 10% whole person impairment threshold imposed by subsection 24(7) of the SRC Act, for permanent impairment compensation to be payable.

DIB AND COMCARE [2008] AATA 739

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from