Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 13 APRIL 2020

Trial by jury and Cardinal George Pell

This article looks at jury verdicts and judges in criminal appeals, with examples from the case of Cardinal George Pell.

AustraliaCriminal Law

There will be more than enough fervent comment about the High Court's acquittal of Cardinal George Pell on sexual assault charges. The purpose of this present item, however, is to look at the balance between jury verdicts and the judges in criminal appeals; and at how that has played out in the case of Cardinal Pell.

The jury from medieval times

The jury in criminal trials is an ancient institution. The English like to claim it as one of England's great contributions to modern jurisprudence, but there is some evidence that the jury concept came to England with William the Conqueror.

The underlying idea is simple: an accused person should only be adjudged guilty of crimes by a group of people drawn from the community where the accused lived. In the expression "a jury of his peers", the word "peers" conveys not merely some sort of social stratum, but also the notion of "people like the accused". In medieval England the term was sometimes expanded to a jury "of

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from