Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 02 JULY 2019

Should Australia adopt a Director Identification Number (DIN) requirement?

This lapsed bill would have imposed an obligation on all present and future directors to verify their details with ASIC.

AustraliaCorporate/Commercial Law

Should Australia Adopt a Director Identification Number (DIN) Requirement?

On 13 February 2019, the Treasury Laws Amendment (Registries Modernisation and Other Measures) Bill 2019 was introduced to the Australian Parliament (Amendment Bill). The Amendment Bill proposed a director identification number (DIN) requirement as part of a suite of Government initiatives which attempt to detect, deter and penalise phoenix activity. While the Amendment Bill lapsed at dissolution on 11 April 2019, given the cost of phoenixing on the Australian economy, it is relevant to question whether the DIN requirement should be reconsidered by Parliament.

What is phoenixing?

The Explanatory Memorandum to the Amendment Bill describes phoenixing as "when the controllers of a company deliberately avoid paying liabilities by shutting down an indebted company and transferring its assets to another company". This has obvious implications for the creditors and employees of the

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

For further information please contact:

Michael Byrnes, Partner
Phone: + 61 2 9233 5544
Email: [email protected]

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from