Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 30 APRIL 2017

Distributions from discretionary trusts

Holding Redlich
Holding Redlich
Contributor
Holding Redlich

Holding Redlich

Holding Redlich is a large national commercial firm with offices in Melbourne, Canberra, Sydney,...

View firm profile
Explore more from Holding Redlich

On April 12 2017 a very interesting decision by the Full Court of the Federal Court was handed down.

AustraliaCorporate/Commercial Law

On April 12 2017 a very interesting decision by the Full Court of the Federal Court was handed down that allowed the taxpayer's appeal from the Federal Court decision in Thomas v FC of T 2015 ATC 20-526.

The Full Court held that the Supreme Court of Queensland's interpretation of the trust deed and trustee resolutions of a discretionary trust were binding on the Commissioner of Taxation where there were two separate resolutions by the trustee:

  • one dealing with the trust's net income for the relevant years in certain proportions; and
  • the other with the distribution of franking credits in different proportions.

Although the Full Court expressed some relatively strong scepticism about the construction of the resolutions adopted by Applegarth J in the Supreme Court proceedings, it nevertheless determined that the Commissioner was bound by the declaration made by the Supreme Court.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from