Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 25 OCTOBER 2021

Second business interruption test case favours insurers

The case concerned the application and operation of policies of insurance for business interruption or interference.

AustraliaCoronavirus (COVID-19)

The consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic – and the responses by State and Federal Governments - led to many businesses suffering losses stemming from interruptions to their ability to trade during the pandemic.

In Episode 4 of Called to Account (April 2021), we identified a number of key issues likely to feature in appeals underway in the Australian Courts related to COVID-19 business interruption losses, including causation, proximity and the offsetting impacts of government support initiatives. The episode also touched on findings in the recent UK Supreme Court judgement, The Financial Conduct Authority v. Arch Insurance (UK) Limited and Others (UK Test Case) 1.

Those, and other legal, issues are comprehensively addressed in the Federal Court's decision in the second COVID-19 business interruption insurance test case, Swiss Re International Se v LCA Marrickville Pty Limited 2 (Second COVID-19 insurance test cases) (Second Test Case). The presiding judge,

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from