Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 23 FEBRUARY 2022

Game, Set, Match! The Djokovic legal saga explained

Holding Redlich
Holding Redlich
Contributor
Holding Redlich

Holding Redlich

Holding Redlich is a large national commercial firm with offices in Melbourne, Canberra, Sydney,...

View firm profile
Explore more from Holding Redlich

It was the first time since 1999 that neither Federer nor Djokovic played in the main draw of the Australian Open.

AustraliaCoronavirus (COVID-19)

With Roger Federer also absent from the Australian Open, it is the first time since 1999 that neither Federer nor Djokovic played in the main draw of the first grand slam of the year. Instead, Novak Djokovic was replaced by a 'lucky loser' – Salvatore Caruso – who lost in the final round of Men's Singles qualifying. This meant what would've been Djokovic's section of the draw was much weaker.

Had Djokovic won the Australian Open, it would have placed him as the most successful male tennis player of all time, above Rodger Federer and Rafael Nadal. But, alas, Djokovic's deportation last month has denied him the opportunity to claim that title.

We have set out below a detailed account of the relevant events (and the law) that led to the star's ultimate deportation.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

This publication does not deal with every important topic or change in law and is not intended to be relied upon as a substitute for legal or other advice that may be relevant to the reader's specific circumstances. If you have found this publication of interest and would like to know more or wish to obtain legal advice relevant to your circumstances please contact one of the named individuals listed.

See more popular content from