Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 15 SEPTEMBER 2012

Product Liability: High Court ends Australian Vioxx litigation

The High Court refused special leave, suggesting that it did not consider that the applicant could establish causation.

AustraliaConsumer Protection

Peterson v Merck Sharp & Dohme (Australia) Pty Ltd [2012] HCATrans 105

In the March 2012 edition of Insurance Update we reported on the judgment of the Federal Court in the appeal of the representative (class) action brought on behalf of certain consumers of the arthritic drug, Vioxx. Vioxx was alleged to have caused adverse cardiovascular side-effects in several arthritis patients. In October 2011, the Full Court of the Federal Court allowed the appeal against the earlier damages award against the supplier of Vioxx. See our article on the Federal Court appeal judgment here.

In the wake of the Federal Court appeal judgment, the lead applicant in the class action, Graham Peterson (a consumer of Vioxx), applied for special leave to appeal to the High Court. On 11 May 2012 the High Court (comprising French CJ and Crennan J) refused special leave to appeal. Given it was a special leave application, no reasons were given by the High Court, other than a statement from

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from