Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 16 DECEMBER 2014

Food labelling in Australia: a warning on misleading the consumer

The case illustrates the risk in adopting a food labelling campaign without sufficient regard to the impact on consumers.

AustraliaConsumer Protection

Introduction

The ACCC v Pirovic case in Australia illustrates the risk in adopting a food labelling and advertising campaign that does not pay sufficient regard to what is conveyed by the label to consumers.

'Free range' labelling credence claims

'Free range' labelling of eggs has a particularly strong impact on the mind of consumers. It is a credence claim that distinguishes, positively, the associated product from non-free range versions of the same product. A 'free range' product is often priced at a significant premium, and it is invariably marketed with a high degree of prominence given to the 'free range' claim (for example, eggs are sold as 'free range eggs' rather than as 'eggs that are produced by free range chickens'). Indeed, in Australia in 2013, free range eggs were priced at an average premium of 75 cents per dozen over barn-laid eggs. And, since 2009, eggs labelled as 'free range' have gone from a 25 per cent share of the retail market to

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from