Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 21 JANUARY 2008

Asbestos Litigation – Two Product Liability Cases

The recent decisions of these cases show that breach of duty and causation are still difficult to prove in dust disease cases.

AustraliaConsumer Protection
Con Gotis-Graham
Con Gotis-Graham
Charles Gregory
Charles Gregory

The recent decisions of Amaca Pty Limited (under NSW administered winding up) v Moss [2007] WASCA 162 and Amaca Pty Limited (under NSW administered winding up) v Hannell [2007] WASCA 158 show that breach of duty and causation are still difficult to prove in dust disease cases.

Facts

Mr Hannell was born in the UK on 23 October 1942. He emigrated to Western Australia in 1981. In October 2005 he was diagnosed with malignant mesothelioma. The only exposure to asbestos that he could remember was when he worked with asbestos cement (AC) products at his home on a number of occasions between 1983 and 1990.

Mr Moss was born in the UK on 16 August 1927. He migrated to Perth in 1989. He was diagnosed with mesothelioma in November 2005. The only exposure to asbestos that he could remember was when he worked with AC products at his home on four separate occasions between 1989 and the early

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from