The Legal 500

Twitter Logo Youtube Circle Icon LinkedIn Icon

CMS

Offices

Other ranked firms

The following firms have provided more information to help you choose the right firm.


Spain

Banking and finance

Jones Day

ONTIER

Araoz & Rueda

Hogan Lovells International LLP

Capital markets: Debt

Ramón y Cajal Abogados

DLA Piper LLP

Baker McKenzie

Simmons & Simmons

Capital markets: Equity

Pérez-Llorca

White & Case LLP

Ramón y Cajal Abogados

Latham & Watkins LLP

Commercial, corporate and M&A

Araoz & Rueda

Deloitte Legal

BROSETA Abogados

DLA Piper LLP

Dispute resolution

Simmons & Simmons

ECIJA

GTA Villamagna Abogados

Araoz & Rueda

Andersen Tax & Legal

Latham & Watkins LLP

B. Cremades & Asociados

Eversheds Sutherland Nicea

Roca Junyent

BROSETA Abogados

RCD

ONTIER

EU and competition

Gómez-Acebo & Pombo

Baker McKenzie

Employment

Clifford Chance

Gómez-Acebo & Pombo

Deloitte Legal

Industry focus: TMT

Bird & Bird

RCD

Pérez-Llorca

Eversheds Sutherland Nicea

Hogan Lovells International LLP

Insurance

Blanco & Asociados Abogados

KPMG Abogados

Intellectual property: Copyright

Augusta Abogados

Roca Junyent

Jones Day

DLA Piper LLP

Intellectual property: Trade marks

DA Lawyers

Eversheds Sutherland Nicea

Fieldfisher JAUSAS

Private equity

BROSETA Abogados

Dentons

Ventura Garcés & López-Ibor

Araoz & Rueda

Projects and energy

Araoz & Rueda

Dentons

Public law

DLA Piper LLP

Baker McKenzie

RCD

GTA Villamagna Abogados

Real estate and construction

Araoz & Rueda

Simmons & Simmons

GTA Villamagna Abogados

Cases&Lacambra

ONTIER

Ventura Garcés & López-Ibor

BROSETA Abogados

Roca Junyent

Squire Patton Boggs

Restructuring and insolvency

DLA Piper LLP

Pérez-Llorca

Baker McKenzie

Simmons & Simmons

Tax

Araoz & Rueda

Ventura Garcés & López-Ibor

Dentons

Eversheds Sutherland Nicea

Ramón y Cajal Abogados

Andersen Tax & Legal

Simmons & Simmons

White-collar crime

Jones Day

Simmons & Simmons


Legal Developments by:
CMS

  • Access to justice: protective costs orders in planning challenges

    Third parties and competing developers have no rights of appeal to the Secretary of State against planning decisions. Disappointed applicants can appeal to the Secretary of State and can have the merits of the application reconsidered. The only remedy available to a disappointed third party is a challenge by way of judicial review in the High Court on a point of law. The sense of frustration and disempowerment this creates has not been helped by the increasing complexity of the planning process and the use of consultation to legitimise decisions that many perceive may already have been taken.
    - CMS Group

Legal Developments in Spain

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to