Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 20 APRIL 2026

What Mock Exercises Reveal That Briefs Cannot

Boies Schiller Flexner LLP
Boies Schiller Flexner LLP
Contributor
Boies Schiller Flexner LLP

Boies Schiller Flexner LLP

Boies Schiller Flexner is a firm of internationally recognized trial lawyers, crisis managers, and...

View firm profile
Explore more from Boies Schiller Flexner LLP

Retired U.S. District Court Judge Shira Scheindlin reveals how mock exercises and simulated hearings expose critical weaknesses in legal arguments that written briefs cannot capture. Through real-time testing, attorneys discover which arguments resonate with judges and where their persuasive strategies fall short, gaining a decisive courtroom advantage.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

In a recent New York Law Journal article, BSF attorney and retired U.S. District Court Judge Shira Scheindlin explains the importance of mock exercises, such as simulated hearings or trials. She emphasizes these exercises expose how arguments perform in real time, revealing what resonates with judges and where clarity falls short. As Judge Scheindlin explains, mock sessions sharpen credibility, tone, and persuasion, giving attorneys a decisive advantage before they step into court.

NEW YORK LAW JOURNAL: What Mock Exercises Reveal That Briefs Cannot

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from