Search
Search
Menu
Menu
Close
Close
Close
Search
Rankings
Jurisdictions
Submissions
Research+
Green Guide
Future Lawyers
Firms & Lawyers
Service Providers
Barristers’ Sets
Networks
Interview with…
In-House
In-House Content
GC Powerlist
Knowledge Centre
Data Products
Legal Business
News & Developments
Special Reports
About us
Legal 500
FAQs
Marketing
Careers
Contact us
Comparative Guides
Events
Legal 500 TV
About us
Legal 500
FAQs
Marketing
Careers
Contact us
Deutschland
DE
Paris
FR
home
Rankings
United States
Intellectual property
Copyright
Firms
Lawyers
How are firms ranked?
All firms
Global
National
What does global and national mean?
Client satisfaction
What is client satisfaction?
1
Cowan, Liebowitz & Latman, PC
Firm profile
Compare
1
Kirkland & Ellis LLP
Firm profile
Compare
1
Latham & Watkins LLP
Client satisfaction
Firm profile
Compare
1
Loeb & Loeb LLP
Firm profile
Compare
1
Morrison Foerster
Firm profile
Compare
2
Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP
Firm profile
Compare
2
Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP
Firm profile
Compare
2
Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton
Compare
2
Mitchell Silberberg & Knupp LLP
Compare
2
Oppenheim + Zebrak Law, LLP
Compare
2
Pryor Cashman LLP
Compare
3
ArentFox Schiff
Firm profile
Compare
3
Arnold & Porter
Client satisfaction
Firm profile
Compare
3
Davis+Gilbert LLP
Client satisfaction
Firm profile
Compare
3
DLA Piper LLP (US)
Firm profile
Compare
3
Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP
Firm profile
Compare
3
Mayer Brown
Firm profile
Compare
3
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP
Firm profile
Compare
3
Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP
Firm profile
Compare
3
Proskauer Rose LLP
Client satisfaction
Firm profile
Compare
3
Winston & Strawn LLP
Firm profile
Compare
4
Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton
Firm profile
Compare
4
Katten
Firm profile
Compare
4
Cowan, DeBaets, Abrahams & Sheppard LLP
Compare
4
Fenwick & West LLP
Compare
Nixon Peabody LLP
Firm profile
Compare
Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP
Compare
White & Case LLP
Firm profile
Compare
Comparative Guides
View
View
Intellectual Property
United States
Contribution from
Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman, LLP