Search
Search
Menu
Menu
Close
Close
Close
Search
Rankings
Jurisdictions
Submissions
Research+
Green Guide
Future Lawyers
Firms & Lawyers
Service Providers
Barristers’ Sets
Networks
Interview with…
In-House
In-House Content
GC Powerlist
Knowledge Centre
Data Products
Legal Business
News & Developments
Special Reports
About us
Legal 500
FAQs
Newsletters
Careers
Contact us
Comparative Guides
Events
Legal 500 TV
About us
Legal 500
FAQs
Newsletters
Careers
Contact us
Deutschland
DE
Paris
FR
home
Rankings
United States
Dispute resolution
International arbitration
Firms
Lawyers
How are firms ranked?
How are firms ranked?
All firms
Global
National
What does global and national mean?
Client satisfaction
What is client satisfaction?
1
Debevoise & Plimpton LLP
Client satisfaction
More information
Compare
1
Freshfields LLP
More information
Compare
1
King & Spalding LLP
More information
Compare
1
White & Case LLP
More information
Compare
2
Arnold & Porter
Client satisfaction
More information
Compare
2
Chaffetz Lindsey LLP
More information
Compare
2
Curtis, Mallet-Prevost, Colt & Mosle LLP
More information
Compare
2
Paul Hastings LLP
More information
Compare
2
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
Client satisfaction
More information
Compare
2
Three Crowns LLP
More information
Compare
2
Covington & Burling LLP
Compare
2
Foley Hoag LLP
Compare
3
Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton
More information
Compare
3
Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP
Client satisfaction
More information
Compare
3
Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP
More information
Compare
3
Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP
More information
Compare
3
Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP
More information
Compare
3
Reed Smith LLP
Compare
4
BakerHostetler
More information
Compare
4
Baker Botts L.L.P.
More information
Compare
4
Clifford Chance
More information
Compare
4
Cooley LLP
More information
Compare
4
Dechert LLP
More information
Compare
4
DLA Piper LLP (US)
More information
Compare
4
Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer
Client satisfaction
More information
Compare
4
Jones Day
Client satisfaction
More information
Compare
4
Latham & Watkins
Client satisfaction
More information
Compare
4
Sidley Austin LLP
More information
Compare
4
Vinson & Elkins LLP
More information
Compare
4
WilmerHale
More information
Compare
4
Winston & Strawn LLP
More information
Compare
4
Eversheds Sutherland
Compare
4
Squire Patton Boggs
Compare
5
A&O Shearman
More information
Compare
5
Baker McKenzie LLP
More information
Compare
5
Boies Schiller Flexner LLP
More information
Compare
5
Dentons
Client satisfaction
More information
Compare
5
K&L Gates
More information
Compare
5
Linklaters LLP
More information
Compare
5
Mayer Brown
More information
Compare
5
McDermott Will & Schulte
Client satisfaction
More information
Compare
5
Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
Client satisfaction
More information
Compare
5
Withers
Client satisfaction
More information
Compare
5
Pierson Ferdinand LLP
Compare
Womble Bond Dickinson
More information
Compare
Akerman LLP
More information
Compare
Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP
More information
Compare
Comparative Guides
View
View
Investment Treaty Arbitration
United States
Contribution from
Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman, LLP