Search
Search
Menu
Menu
Close
Close
Close
Search
Rankings
Jurisdictions
Submissions
Research+
Green Guide
Future Lawyers
Firms & Lawyers
Service Providers
Barristers’ Sets
Networks
Interview with…
In-House
In-House Content
GC Powerlist
Knowledge Centre
Data Products
Legal Business
News & Developments
Special Reports
About us
Legal 500
FAQs
Marketing
Careers
Contact us
Comparative Guides
Events
Legal 500 TV
About us
Legal 500
FAQs
Marketing
Careers
Contact us
Deutschland
DE
Paris
FR
home
Rankings
United States
Dispute resolution
International arbitration
Firms
Lawyers
How are firms ranked?
All firms
Global
National
What does global and national mean?
Client satisfaction
What is client satisfaction?
1
Debevoise & Plimpton LLP
Client satisfaction
Firm profile
Compare
1
Freshfields LLP
Firm profile
Compare
1
King & Spalding LLP
Firm profile
Compare
1
White & Case LLP
Firm profile
Compare
2
Arnold & Porter
Client satisfaction
Firm profile
Compare
2
Chaffetz Lindsey LLP
Firm profile
Compare
2
Curtis, Mallet-Prevost, Colt & Mosle LLP
Firm profile
Compare
2
Paul Hastings LLP
Firm profile
Compare
2
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
Client satisfaction
Firm profile
Compare
2
Three Crowns LLP
Firm profile
Compare
2
Covington & Burling LLP
Compare
2
Foley Hoag LLP
Compare
3
Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton
Firm profile
Compare
3
Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP
Client satisfaction
Firm profile
Compare
3
Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP
Firm profile
Compare
3
Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP
Firm profile
Compare
3
Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP
Firm profile
Compare
3
Reed Smith LLP
Compare
4
BakerHostetler
Firm profile
Compare
4
Baker Botts L.L.P.
Firm profile
Compare
4
Clifford Chance
Firm profile
Compare
4
Cooley LLP
Firm profile
Compare
4
Dechert LLP
Firm profile
Compare
4
DLA Piper LLP (US)
Firm profile
Compare
4
Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer
Client satisfaction
Firm profile
Compare
4
Jones Day
Client satisfaction
Firm profile
Compare
4
Latham & Watkins
Client satisfaction
Firm profile
Compare
4
Sidley Austin LLP
Firm profile
Compare
4
Vinson & Elkins LLP
Firm profile
Compare
4
WilmerHale
Firm profile
Compare
4
Winston & Strawn LLP
Firm profile
Compare
4
Eversheds Sutherland
Compare
4
Squire Patton Boggs
Compare
5
A&O Shearman
Firm profile
Compare
5
Baker McKenzie LLP
Firm profile
Compare
5
Boies Schiller Flexner LLP
Firm profile
Compare
5
Dentons
Client satisfaction
Firm profile
Compare
5
K&L Gates
Firm profile
Compare
5
Linklaters LLP
Firm profile
Compare
5
Mayer Brown
Firm profile
Compare
5
McDermott Will & Schulte
Client satisfaction
Firm profile
Compare
5
Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
Client satisfaction
Firm profile
Compare
5
Withers
Client satisfaction
Firm profile
Compare
5
Pierson Ferdinand LLP
Compare
Akerman LLP
Firm profile
Compare
Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP
Firm profile
Compare
Womble Bond Dickinson
Compare
Comparative Guides
View
View
Investment Treaty Arbitration
United States
Contribution from
Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman, LLP