The Legal 500 > Clarke Willmott LLP > Birmingham, ENGLAND

Clarke Willmott LLP

138 EDMUND STREET, BIRMINGHAM, B3 2ES, ENGLAND

Tel:: Work 0845 209 1000
Fax:: Fax 0845 209 2001
DX:: 722320 BIRMINGHAM 75

Web:: www.clarkewillmott.com
Email:

Taunton, Southampton, Manchester, London, Bristol, Birmingham

Recommendations

West Midlands : Corporate and commercial > Corporate and commercial: Birmingham

West Midlands : Finance > Insolvency and corporate recovery

West Midlands : Private client > Personal tax, trusts and probate

West Midlands : Real estate > Commercial property: Birmingham
West Midlands : Real estate > Planning
West Midlands : Real estate > Property litigation

West Midlands : Corporate and commercial

Within Corporate and commercial: Birmingham, tier 4

Clarke Willmott LLP acts for Kumho Tyre (UK) and Integrated Publishing Solutions. Andrew Beedham is highly rated for his private equity and joint venture work. Tony Powles focuses on owner-managed businesses and small and medium enterprises.

[back to top]

West Midlands : Finance

Within Insolvency and corporate recovery, Clarke Willmott LLP is a third tier firm,

Clarke Willmott LLP provides ‘technically sound and commercially excellent advice’. It receives a steady stream of instructions from Smith & Williamson, BDO and Moore Stephens, and also acts for asset based lenders. Practice head Stephanie Slinn demonstrates ‘great attention to detail’.

[back to top]

West Midlands : Private client

Within Personal tax, trusts and probate Personal tax, trusts and probate

[back to top]

West Midlands : Real estate

Within Commercial property: Birmingham, Clarke Willmott LLP is a third tier firm,

The ‘very thorough and diligent’ Jonathan Morton heads the ‘responsive’ team at Clarke Willmott LLP, which is particularly strong in the retail sector, and acts for Clydesdale Bank, Pochin Homes, Wentworth Kitchens and Calthorpe Estate, among others.

[back to top]

Within Planning, Clarke Willmott LLP is a second tier firm,

The well-established team at Clarke Willmott LLP includes Rebecca Warren, who ‘consistently demonstrates a keen commercial understanding of development issues’. The firm provided planning advice to Stratford on Avon District Council on the drafting of a s106 agreement, while other highlights included a win in the Court of Appeal.

[back to top]

Within Property litigation, Clarke Willmott LLP is a third tier firm,

Clarke Willmott LLP had a busy year, and successfully acted for the developer of the largest service station under construction in Europe. Paul Knight recently moved to Shoosmiths; Chris Taylor is now the key contact.

[back to top]

Further information on Clarke Willmott LLP

Please choose from this list to view details of what we say about Clarke Willmott LLP in other jurisdictions.

London

Offices in London

North West

Offices in Manchester

South East

Offices in Southampton

South West

Offices in Bristol and Taunton

West Midlands

Offices in Birmingham

Search News and Articles

Legal Developments in the UK

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to

Getting the breaks

Shook, Hardy & Bacon currently authors the Insurance section of The In-House Lawyer magazine. For more information and articles from this author click here .

- Falcon Chambers
Product liability and dietary supplements

Shook, Hardy & Bacon currently authors the Insurance section of The In-House Lawyer magazine. For more information and articles from this author click here .

- Shook, Hardy & Bacon International LLP
The calm before  the storm: are  you prepared for  a dawn raid?

WilmerHale currently authors the Fraud and Corporate Crime section of The In-House Lawyer magazine. For more information and articles from this author click here .

- WilmerHale
International shipment of waste: transporters beware

Burges Salmon LLP currently authors the Environment and Energy section of The In-House Lawyer magazine. For more information and articles from this author click here

- Burges Salmon LLP
Revisiting Bartoline

Macfarlanes LLP currently authors the Litigation & Dispute Resolution section of The In-House Lawyer magazine. For more information and articles from this author click here .

- Macfarlanes
Rent in administration proceedings: a headache for landlords

Druces currently authors the Insolvency and corporate restructuring section of The In-House Lawyer magazine. For more information and articles from this author click here .

- Druces
It’s a new dawn, it’s a new day

Arnold & Porter (UK) LLP currently authors the EU & Competition section of The In-House Lawyer magazine. For more information and articles from this author click here .

- Arnold & Porter (UK) LLP
Court of Appeal provides useful guidance on the  test for remoteness  of damages for  breach o

Edwards Wildman Palmer UK LLP currently authors the Contract section of The In-House Lawyer magazine. For more information and articles from this author click here .

- Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP
Unsafe products:  identifying serious risks and notifying the relevant authorities

Shook, Hardy & Bacon currently authors the Insurance section of The In-House Lawyer magazine. For more information and articles from this author click here . In the event that a safety problem is identified with one of your products, you will need to undertake a risk assessment to comply with the General Product Safety Directive.

- Shook, Hardy & Bacon International LLP
Supreme Court provides guidance  on forum conveniens and piercing the corporate veil 

Macfarlanes LLP currently authors the Litigation & Dispute Resolution section of The In-House Lawyer magazine. For more information and articles from this author click here . This article considers the Supreme Court decision in VTB Capital plc v Nutritek International Corp & or s [2013]. Perhaps the most striking aspect of the case is that it casts doubt on the notion that the Court has the power to pierce the corporate veil. The Supreme Court also held that, even if the power to pierce the corporate veil does exist, it does not enable a claimant to hold parties that control a company jointly and severally liable under contracts entered into by that company.  

- Macfarlanes